Blog comment on UK rocket and drone regulation, off-topic under Schneier's 'The Future of AI Cryptanalysis' post
This item is a reader comment by Clive Robinson posted under a Schneier on Security entry titled "The Future of AI Cryptanalysis". It does not discuss cryptanalysis and reports no security incident. The commenter discusses UK Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) restrictions on university rocket projects, including limits on flight control and on using Android phones. He also covers the difficulty of banning consumer electronics made in China, and pressure from the UK defence industry on politicians to relax these rules. He recounts past embedded-hardware work, such as repurposing a handheld game console and Raspberry Pi-class boards for broadcast transmitter controls. He argues that drones and their control systems may be a bigger "existential threat" than AI because of their unrestricted agency. The comment is opinion and anecdote with no IOCs, vulnerabilities, threat actors or confirmed attacks, so it has no direct operational relevance for defenders.
Linha do tempo
-
Blog comment on UK rocket and drone regulation, off-topic under Schneier's 'The Future of AI Cryptanalysis' post
ler a análise desta fonte ocultar
This item is a reader comment by Clive Robinson posted under a Schneier on Security entry titled "The Future of AI Cryptanalysis". It does not discuss cryptanalysis and reports no security incident. The commenter discusses UK Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) restrictions on university rocket projects, including limits on flight control and on using Android phones. He also covers the difficulty of banning consumer electronics made in China, and pressure from the UK defence industry on politicians to relax these rules. He recounts past embedded-hardware work, such as repurposing a handheld game console and Raspberry Pi-class boards for broadcast transmitter controls. He argues that drones and their control systems may be a bigger "existential threat" than AI because of their unrestricted agency. The comment is opinion and anecdote with no IOCs, vulnerabilities, threat actors or confirmed attacks, so it has no direct operational relevance for defenders.