Huntress guide compares 13 cybersecurity frameworks (NIST CSF, CIS Controls, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS) and how to choose
This Huntress vendor blog post is educational and promotional content, not a report of a specific threat or incident. It compares 13 cybersecurity and regulatory frameworks, including NIST CSF 2.0, NIST SP 800-53, ISO 27001, CIS Critical Security Controls, COBIT, HIPAA, PCI DSS 4.0, SOC 2, MITRE ATT&CK, CMMC 2.0, GLBA, FISMA and FFIEC CAT. For each one it describes the intended audience and core requirements, and it maps them to Huntress offerings such as Managed EDR, ITDR, SIEM, ISPM and Security Awareness Training. It closes with selection criteria and four adoption steps. It reports no vulnerabilities, IOCs, actors or incidents.
Technical Details
- NIST CSF 2.0 has six functions: Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond and Recover.
- CIS Controls has 18 controls; Implementation Group 1 (IG1) is the essential-hygiene set of 56 safeguards.
- CMMC 2.0 has three levels; Level 2 aligns with NIST SP 800-171 and its 110 practices.
- PCI DSS 4.0 has 12 requirements and puts more weight on continuous security.
- The GLBA Safeguards Rule requires MFA, encryption at rest and in transit, and annual penetration testing or continuous monitoring.
Remediation
- Choose frameworks based on industry regulation, customer expectations, budget and team size, regional laws, and competitor standards.
- Start with a gap analysis.
- Take quick wins from the CIS Controls, such as MFA and asset inventory.
- Secure leadership buy-in.
- Treat framework adoption as a continuous cycle, not a one-off project.
Linha do tempo
-
Huntress guide compares 13 cybersecurity frameworks (NIST CSF, CIS Controls, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS) and how to choose
ler a análise desta fonte ocultar
This Huntress vendor blog post is educational and promotional content, not a report of a specific threat or incident. It compares 13 cybersecurity and regulatory frameworks, including NIST CSF 2.0, NIST SP 800-53, ISO 27001, CIS Critical Security Controls, COBIT, HIPAA, PCI DSS 4.0, SOC 2, MITRE ATT&CK, CMMC 2.0, GLBA, FISMA and FFIEC CAT. For each one it describes the intended audience and core requirements, and it maps them to Huntress offerings such as Managed EDR, ITDR, SIEM, ISPM and Security Awareness Training. It closes with selection criteria and four adoption steps. It reports no vulnerabilities, IOCs, actors or incidents.
Technical Details
- NIST CSF 2.0 has six functions: Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond and Recover.
- CIS Controls has 18 controls; Implementation Group 1 (IG1) is the essential-hygiene set of 56 safeguards.
- CMMC 2.0 has three levels; Level 2 aligns with NIST SP 800-171 and its 110 practices.
- PCI DSS 4.0 has 12 requirements and puts more weight on continuous security.
- The GLBA Safeguards Rule requires MFA, encryption at rest and in transit, and annual penetration testing or continuous monitoring.
Remediation
- Choose frameworks based on industry regulation, customer expectations, budget and team size, regional laws, and competitor standards.
- Start with a gap analysis.
- Take quick wins from the CIS Controls, such as MFA and asset inventory.
- Secure leadership buy-in.
- Treat framework adoption as a continuous cycle, not a one-off project.