/
attack_type:prompt_injection × victim_sectors:"software development" × limpar

Resultados

3 casos · pág. 1/1

safedep.io · low

SafeDep tests Jev and Gryph to flag malicious actions by compromised AI coding agents such as Claude Code

A SafeDep researcher describes an experiment that uses Gryph (an audit trail for AI coding agents) and TypeSafe AI's Jev model to separate a developer's normal agent activity from attacks. The article cites threats to agents such as Claude Code and Codex: the Mini Shai-Hulud worm commits Claude Code hooks into repositories, malicious npm …

safedep.io · high

Hijacked AI coding assistant session recommends malicious PyPI package, seeding Shai-Hulud worm across ~100 internal repositories

In September 2026, researchers reported an attack that began inside a live AI coding assistant session at a software company. The attacker gained control of a developer's session, and the assistant recommended a PyPI package that looked normal. The developer installed it, and a hidden infostealer took source code, repository secrets and h…

f5.com · high

F5 Labs CASI Leaderboard: Sugar-Coated Poison LLM attack and AI tooling flaws in Copilot, OpenClaw (CVE-2026-25253) and Claude Code (CVE-2026-21852)

F5 Labs published its March 2026 CASI Leaderboard update, which is now dominated by OpenAI and Anthropic. Z.ai's GLM-5 performs well on price and capability but has a weak security posture (CASI 37.56 vs 96.61 for Claude Opus 4.6 and 92.58 for GPT-5.2). The report also spotlights Sugar-Coated Poison (SCP), a multi-turn technique that grad…